No More: Defending The Status Quo

sta·tus quo

noun: the existing state of affairs, especially regarding social or political issues.
"they have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo"
-Wikipedia 
--------------------  

 

THE WARNING SIGNS OF DEFENDING THE STATUS QUO: 

When confronted with a new idea, do you:
 
  • Consider the cost of switching before you consider the benefits.

 

  • Highlight the pain to a few instead of the benefits for the many?

 

  • Exaggerate how good things are now in order to reduce your fear of change?

 

  • Undercut the credibility, authority or experience of people behind the change?

 

  • Grab onto the rare thing that could go wrong instead of amplifying the likely thing that will go right?

 

  • Focus on short-term costs instead of long-term benefits, because the short-term is more vivid for you?

 

  • Fight to retain benefits and status earned only through tenure and longevity?

 

  • Embrace an instinct to accept consistent ongoing costs instead of swallowing a one-time expense?

 

  • Slow implementation and decision making down instead of speeding it up?

 

  • Embrace sunk costs?

 

  • Imagine that your competition is going to be as afraid of change as you are? Even the competition that hasn't entered the market yet and has nothing to lose…

 

  • Compare the best of what you have now with the possible worst of what a change might bring?
 
Extracted from here.
 

Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published